Difference between revisions of "Category:Questions about the historical application of Biblical law"
From Theonomy Wiki
(add base translation link) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{:Navleft|Category:Answered Questions|Answered Questions}} | + | <languages />{{:Navleft|Category:Answered Questions|<translate>Answered Questions</translate>}} |
<div class="questionbody"> | <div class="questionbody"> | ||
This is a category for questions about whether or how Biblical law has been applied by people in history, including both Biblical and extra-Biblical history. | This is a category for questions about whether or how Biblical law has been applied by people in history, including both Biblical and extra-Biblical history. | ||
Revision as of 00:37, 9 August 2020
This is a category for questions about whether or how Biblical law has been applied by people in history, including both Biblical and extra-Biblical history.
Pages in category "Questions about the historical application of Biblical law"
The following 27 pages are in this category, out of 27 total.
D
- Does Joseph's intent to divorce Mary show that the death penalty for adultery was not mandatory?
- Zeigt die Absicht Josephs, sich von Maria scheiden zu lassen, dass die Todesstrafe für Ehebruch nicht obligatorisch war?
- Does Joseph's intent to divorce Mary show that the death penalty for adultery was not mandatory?
- ¿La intención de José de divorciarse de María muestra que la pena de muerte por adulterio no era obligatoria?
- L'intention de Joseph de divorcer de Marie montre-t-elle que la peine de mort pour adultère n'était pas obligatoire?
- Laat de intentie van Jozef om te scheiden van Maria zien dat de doodstraf voor overspel niet verplicht was?
- A intenção de José de se divorciar de Maria mostra que a pena de morte por adultério não era obrigatória?
- Доказывает ли намерение Иосифа развестись с Марией, что смертная казнь за прелюбодеяние не была обязательной?
- Does the divorce of the foreign women in Ezra 9-10 show that civil government has authority to dissolve marriages or preside over "divorce trials"?
- Zeigt die Scheidung der Ausländerinnen in Esra 9-10, dass die Zivilregierung befugt ist, Ehen aufzulösen oder "Scheidungsverfahren" zu leiten?
- Does the divorce of the foreign women in Ezra 9-10 show that civil government has authority to dissolve marriages or preside over "divorce trials"?
- ¿El divorcio de las mujeres extranjeras en Esdras 9-10 muestra que el gobierno civil tiene autoridad para disolver matrimonios o presidir "juicios de divorcio"?
- Le divorce des femmes étrangères à Ezra 9-10 montre-t-il que le gouvernement civil a autorité pour dissoudre les mariages ou présider les "procès de divorce"?
- Laat de echtscheiding van de buitenlandse vrouwen in Ezra 9-10 zien dat de burgerlijke overheid de bevoegdheid heeft om huwelijken te ontbinden of "echtscheidingsprocessen" voor te zitten?
- O divórcio das mulheres estrangeiras em Ezra 9-10 mostra que o governo civil tem autoridade para dissolver casamentos ou presidir a "julgamentos de divórcio"?
- Показывает ли развод женщин-иностранок в Эзре 9-10, что гражданское правительство имеет право расторгнуть брак или председательствовать в "бракоразводных процессах"?
W
- Was God's law available prior to Sinai?
- War Gottes Gesetz vor dem Sinai verfügbar?
- Was God's law available prior to Sinai?
- ¿Estaba la ley de Dios disponible antes del Sinaí?
- La loi de Dieu était-elle disponible avant le Sinaï?
- Was God's wet beschikbaar voor de Sinaï?
- A lei de Deus estava disponível antes do Sinai?
- Был ли закон Божий доступен до Синайского полуострова?
- Why didn't King Solomon punish the prostitutes who came to him for justice?
- Why wasn't King David executed for his adultery with Bathsheba?
- Why wasn't Paul executed for either murder or kidnapping?
