Difference between revisions of "Category:Questions about the differing treatment of persons in Biblical law"
From Theonomy Wiki
(added translate tags) |
m (Protected "Questions about the differing treatment of persons in Biblical law" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 14:46, 31 October 2020
Sometimes God's law treats certain people differently than others. This category organizes question about these cases.
Pages in category "Questions about the differing treatment of persons in Biblical law"
The following 17 pages are in this category, out of 17 total.
D
- Does Biblical law really allow a father to sell his daughter into slavery?
- Erlaubt das biblische Gesetz einem Vater wirklich, seine Tochter in die Sklaverei zu verkaufen?
- Does Biblical law really allow a father to sell his daughter into slavery?
- ¿Realmente la ley bíblica permite a un padre vender a su hija como esclava?
- Staat de Bijbelse wet echt toe dat een vader zijn dochter in slavernij verkoopt?
- Does Exodus 12:43-49 mean that a stranger in the land must become a covenant member before he or she can be treated equally under the law?
- Does the law in Exodus 21:22-25, where men cause an unborn child to be born prematurely, show that abortion is not murder?
- Does the restitution payment for killing a slave in Exod. 21:32 show that slaves had less protection than free persons under Biblical Law?
- Doesn't Lev. 27:6 show that God places no value on the lives of unborn children?
I
- Is the premarital unchastity case of Deut. 22:13 an example of the justice system assuming guilt until a defendant proves her innocence?
- Ist der voreheliche Unkeuschheitsfall von Deut 22:13 ein Beispiel dafür, dass das Justizsystem von Schuld ausgeht, bis ein Angeklagter seine Unschuld beweist?
- Is the premarital unchastity case of Deut. 22:13 an example of the justice system assuming guilt until a defendant proves her innocence?
- ¿Es el caso de la falta de castidad prematrimonial del Deut. 22:13 un ejemplo de que el sistema judicial asume la culpa hasta que el acusado demuestre su inocencia?
- Le cas de Deut. 22:13 sur la nonchalance avant le mariage est-il un exemple de système judiciaire qui suppose la culpabilité jusqu'à ce qu'un défendeur prouve son innocence?
- Il caso di castità prematrimoniale di Dt 22,13 è un esempio di sistema giudiziario che si assume la colpa fino a quando l'imputata non prova la sua innocenza?
- Is de zaak van de onkuisheid voor het huwelijk van Deut. 22:13 een voorbeeld van het gerechtelijk systeem dat uitgaat van schuld totdat een verdachte haar onschuld bewijst?
- Será o caso de Dt 22,13, antes do casamento, um exemplo de um sistema de justiça que assume a culpa até que um arguido prove a sua inocência?
