Difference between revisions of "Category:Questions about the differing treatment of persons in Biblical law"
From Theonomy Wiki
(Created page with "{{:Navleft|Category:Answered Questions|Answered Questions}} {{:Listquestionpages|{{PAGENAME}}}} {{:Answeredquestioncreateform||{{FULLPAGENAME}}}} {{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}}...") |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 21:41, 14 October 2020
Pages in category "Questions about the differing treatment of persons in Biblical law"
The following 17 pages are in this category, out of 17 total.
D
- Does Biblical law really allow a father to sell his daughter into slavery?
- Erlaubt das biblische Gesetz einem Vater wirklich, seine Tochter in die Sklaverei zu verkaufen?
- Does Biblical law really allow a father to sell his daughter into slavery?
- ¿Realmente la ley bíblica permite a un padre vender a su hija como esclava?
- Staat de Bijbelse wet echt toe dat een vader zijn dochter in slavernij verkoopt?
- Does Exodus 12:43-49 mean that a stranger in the land must become a covenant member before he or she can be treated equally under the law?
- Does the law in Exodus 21:22-25, where men cause an unborn child to be born prematurely, show that abortion is not murder?
- Does the restitution payment for killing a slave in Exod. 21:32 show that slaves had less protection than free persons under Biblical Law?
- Doesn't Lev. 27:6 show that God places no value on the lives of unborn children?
I
- Is the premarital unchastity case of Deut. 22:13 an example of the justice system assuming guilt until a defendant proves her innocence?
- Ist der voreheliche Unkeuschheitsfall von Deut 22:13 ein Beispiel dafür, dass das Justizsystem von Schuld ausgeht, bis ein Angeklagter seine Unschuld beweist?
- Is the premarital unchastity case of Deut. 22:13 an example of the justice system assuming guilt until a defendant proves her innocence?
- ¿Es el caso de la falta de castidad prematrimonial del Deut. 22:13 un ejemplo de que el sistema judicial asume la culpa hasta que el acusado demuestre su inocencia?
- Le cas de Deut. 22:13 sur la nonchalance avant le mariage est-il un exemple de système judiciaire qui suppose la culpabilité jusqu'à ce qu'un défendeur prouve son innocence?
- Il caso di castità prematrimoniale di Dt 22,13 è un esempio di sistema giudiziario che si assume la colpa fino a quando l'imputata non prova la sua innocenza?
- Is de zaak van de onkuisheid voor het huwelijk van Deut. 22:13 een voorbeeld van het gerechtelijk systeem dat uitgaat van schuld totdat een verdachte haar onschuld bewijst?
- Será o caso de Dt 22,13, antes do casamento, um exemplo de um sistema de justiça que assume a culpa até que um arguido prove a sua inocência?
