Difference between revisions of "Translations:Is the premarital unchastity case of Deut. 22:13 an example of the justice system assuming guilt until a defendant proves her innocence?/1/en"

Latest revision as of 23:00, 30 November 2020

Information about message (contribute)

This message has no documentation. If you know where or how this message is used, you can help other translators by adding documentation to this message.

Message definition (Is the premarital unchastity case of Deut. 22:13 an example of the justice system assuming guilt until a defendant proves her innocence?)

No. This is a section of the case laws that is often misunderstood, because it is actually intertwining the circumstances of two different prosecutions (legal cases). These cases are not describing a woman who is (as one well-known commentator claims) "presumed guilty until she proves her innocence".<ref>Walter Kaiser, ''Toward Old Testament Ethics'', p. 229</ref>

No. This is a section of the case laws that is often misunderstood, because it is actually intertwining the circumstances of two different prosecutions (legal cases).  These cases are not describing a woman who is (as one well-known commentator claims) "presumed guilty until she proves her innocence".<ref>Walter Kaiser, ''Toward Old Testament Ethics'', p. 229</ref>

TranslationNo. This is a section of the case laws that is often misunderstood, because it is actually intertwining the circumstances of two different prosecutions (legal cases). These cases are not describing a woman who is (as one well-known commentator claims) "presumed guilty until she proves her innocence".<ref>Walter Kaiser, ''Toward Old Testament Ethics'', p. 229</ref>

No. This is a section of the case laws that is often misunderstood, because it is actually intertwining the circumstances of two different prosecutions (legal cases). These cases are not describing a woman who is (as one well-known commentator claims) "presumed guilty until she proves her innocence".^[1]

↑ Walter Kaiser, Toward Old Testament Ethics, p. 229

[1] Walter Kaiser, Toward Old Testament Ethics, p. 229

[1]

Revision as of 22:00, 30 November 2020 (view source) FuzzyBot (talk \| contribs) (Importing a new version from external source)		Latest revision as of 23:00, 30 November 2020 (view source) FuzzyBot (talk \| contribs) (Importing a new version from external source)
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	No. This is a section of the case laws that is often misunderstood, because it is actually intertwining the circumstances of two different prosecutions (legal cases). These cases are not describing a woman who is (as one well-known commentator claims) "presumed guilty until she proves her innocence".<ref>Walter Kaiser, ''Toward Old Testament Ethics, p. 229</ref>	+	No. This is a section of the case laws that is often misunderstood, because it is actually intertwining the circumstances of two different prosecutions (legal cases). These cases are not describing a woman who is (as one well-known commentator claims) "presumed guilty until she proves her innocence".<ref>Walter Kaiser, ''Toward Old Testament Ethics'', p. 229</ref>