Difference between revisions of "Translations:Is the premarital unchastity case of Deut. 22:13 an example of the justice system assuming guilt until a defendant proves her innocence?/1/en"
From Theonomy Wiki
(Importing a new version from external source) |
(Importing a new version from external source) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | No. This is a section of the case laws that is often misunderstood, because it is actually intertwining the circumstances of two different prosecutions (legal cases). These cases are not describing a woman who is (as one well-known commentator claims) "presumed guilty until she proves her innocence".<ref>Walter Kaiser, ''Toward Old Testament Ethics, p. 229</ref> | + | No. This is a section of the case laws that is often misunderstood, because it is actually intertwining the circumstances of two different prosecutions (legal cases). These cases are not describing a woman who is (as one well-known commentator claims) "presumed guilty until she proves her innocence".<ref>Walter Kaiser, ''Toward Old Testament Ethics'', p. 229</ref> |
Latest revision as of 03:00, 1 December 2020
No. This is a section of the case laws that is often misunderstood, because it is actually intertwining the circumstances of two different prosecutions (legal cases). These cases are not describing a woman who is (as one well-known commentator claims) "presumed guilty until she proves her innocence".[1]
- ↑ Walter Kaiser, Toward Old Testament Ethics, p. 229