Latest revision as of 17:00, 19 November 2020
Information about message (contribute ) This message has no documentation.
If you know where or how this message is used, you can help other translators by adding documentation to this message.
Message definition (Is every law of God bound to a particular covenant? )
By adopting this conceptual conflation, these Christians believe they have an argument which denies the binding nature of YHWH's judicial laws in the New Covenant. They reason: if all of these laws were covenantally-bound, then -- unless the laws/penalties were explicitly restated in the New Covenant -- they have been abolished along with the defunct Sinai Covenant.
By adopting this conceptual conflation, these Christians believe they have an argument which denies the binding nature of YHWH's judicial laws in the New Covenant. They reason: if all of these laws were covenantally-bound, then -- unless the laws/penalties were explicitly restated in the New Covenant -- they have been abolished along with the defunct Sinai Covenant. Translation By adopting this conceptual conflation, these Christians believe they have an argument which denies the binding nature of YHWH's judicial laws in the New Covenant. They reason: if all of these laws were covenantally-bound, then -- unless the laws/penalties were explicitly restated in the New Covenant -- they have been abolished along with the defunct Sinai Covenant. By adopting this conceptual conflation, these Christians believe they have an argument which denies the binding nature of YHWH's judicial laws in the New Covenant. They reason: if all of these laws were covenantally-bound, then -- unless the laws/penalties were explicitly restated in the New Covenant -- they have been abolished along with the defunct Sinai Covenant.
