Difference between revisions of "Translations:Does the proverb about the jealous husband show that prostitution is legal? (Prov. 6:32-35)/3/en"

From Theonomy Wiki
(Importing a new version from external source)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 02:00, 22 November 2020

Information about message (contribute)
This message has no documentation. If you know where or how this message is used, you can help other translators by adding documentation to this message.
Message definition (Does the proverb about the jealous husband show that prostitution is legal? (Prov. 6:32-35))
Nevertheless, certain interpreters have proposed reasons why we should not understand these scriptural phrases as referring to mandatory death. One of these proposals ("Victim's Rights") asserts that the (human) victims of these serious crimes (e.g. adultery, rape, kidnapping, false witness in a death penalty case) had the authority both to pardon the criminal and to accept monetary ransom in lieu of the death penalty.
TranslationNevertheless, certain interpreters have proposed reasons why we should not understand these scriptural phrases as referring to mandatory death. One of these proposals ("Victim's Rights") asserts that the (human) victims of these serious crimes (e.g. adultery, rape, kidnapping, false witness in a death penalty case) had the authority both to pardon the criminal and to accept monetary ransom in lieu of the death penalty.

Nevertheless, certain interpreters have proposed reasons why we should not understand these scriptural phrases as referring to mandatory death. One of these proposals ("Victim's Rights") asserts that the (human) victims of these serious crimes (e.g. adultery, rape, kidnapping, false witness in a death penalty case) had the authority both to pardon the criminal and to accept monetary ransom in lieu of the death penalty.