Difference between revisions of "Translations:Does the divorce of the foreign women in Ezra 9-10 show that civil government has authority to dissolve marriages or preside over "divorce trials"?/12/en"

Latest revision as of 04:00, 18 November 2020

Information about message (contribute)

This message has no documentation. If you know where or how this message is used, you can help other translators by adding documentation to this message.

Message definition (Does the divorce of the foreign women in Ezra 9-10 show that civil government has authority to dissolve marriages or preside over "divorce trials"?)

There was no divorce "trial" here, as Kayser asserts. These "marriages" where prima facie illegal according to Biblical law. No (legal) marriage covenant had been broken. No (legal) marriage covenant had even been created. The legal term to describe this is "void ab initio" (invalid from the beginning).

There was no divorce "trial" here, as Kayser asserts. These "marriages" where prima facie <em>illegal</em> according to Biblical law. No (legal) marriage covenant had been broken. No (legal) marriage covenant had even been created. The legal term to describe this is "void <em>ab initio</em>" (invalid from the beginning).

TranslationThere was no divorce "trial" here, as Kayser asserts. These "marriages" where prima facie illegal according to Biblical law. No (legal) marriage covenant had been broken. No (legal) marriage covenant had even been created. The legal term to describe this is "void ab initio" (invalid from the beginning).

There was no divorce "trial" here, as Kayser asserts. These "marriages" where prima facie illegal according to Biblical law. No (legal) marriage covenant had been broken. No (legal) marriage covenant had even been created. The legal term to describe this is "void ab initio" (invalid from the beginning).