Difference between revisions of "Translations:Didn't the law under the Sinai Covenant allow divorce for any cause?/12/en"

Latest revision as of 02:00, 2 December 2020

Information about message (contribute)

This message has no documentation. If you know where or how this message is used, you can help other translators by adding documentation to this message.

Message definition (Didn't the law under the Sinai Covenant allow divorce for any cause?)

{{:Quote|Jesus' teaching starts ... from the "one flesh" of Gen. 2:24, so that it is only because "sexual unfaithfulness" has already violated the unity of the one flesh that the marriage must be regarded as no longer intact. Shammai was concerned with a man's right to initiate divorce, Jesus with the formal recognition that the marriage has already been broken by the wife's action.<ref>R. T. France, ''The Gospel of Matthew'', Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007, p. 721</ref>}}

{{:Quote|Jesus' teaching starts ... from the "one flesh" of Gen. 2:24, so that it is only because "sexual unfaithfulness" has already violated the unity of the one flesh that the marriage must be regarded as no longer intact. Shammai was concerned with a man's right to initiate divorce, Jesus with the formal recognition that the marriage has already been broken by the wife's action.<ref>R. T. France, ''The Gospel of Matthew'', Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007, p. 721</ref>}}

Translation{{:Quote|Jesus' teaching starts ... from the "one flesh" of Gen. 2:24, so that it is only because "sexual unfaithfulness" has already violated the unity of the one flesh that the marriage must be regarded as no longer intact. Shammai was concerned with a man's right to initiate divorce, Jesus with the formal recognition that the marriage has already been broken by the wife's action.<ref>R. T. France, ''The Gospel of Matthew'', Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007, p. 721</ref>}}

Jesus' teaching starts ... from the "one flesh" of Gen. 2:24, so that it is only because "sexual unfaithfulness" has already violated the unity of the one flesh that the marriage must be regarded as no longer intact. Shammai was concerned with a man's right to initiate divorce, Jesus with the formal recognition that the marriage has already been broken by the wife's action.^[1]

↑ R. T. France, The Gospel of Matthew, Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007, p. 721

[1] R. T. France, The Gospel of Matthew, Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007, p. 721

[1]