Translations:Are you allowed to use deadly force in defense of (mere) property?/20/en

From Theonomy Wiki
Revision as of 10:00, 24 November 2020 by FuzzyBot (talk | contribs) (Importing a new version from external source)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
  1. He takes the second case (in verse 3) as referring to a thief who is not killed, but merely "knocked out", waking up after "the sun has risen".
  2. He claims that the injured thief (not the homeowner) is the one to whom bloodguilt must be attributed in verse 3.