Thread history
Viewing a history listing
| Time | User | Activity | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01:54, 6 August 2020 | Mgarcia (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to Graven Images and 2CV) |
| 00:30, 5 August 2020 | Boxcartenant (talk | contribs) | New thread created |
In the interpretation section, I wrote an explanation of my understanding of the argument for and against the popular "2CV" trend in reformed circles. I am in favor of the interpretation which allows images to be made of anything, as long as they are not intended for worship. I added a second section below mine, titled "Graven Images (against)" where someone from the opposite side of the discussion could write their own blurb, but I think it would be better if the sections were combined and called "Graven Images (2CV)". So, I hope that in the future someone who is opposed to my interpretation will review what I wrote and make any changes necessary in order to make the description of this controversy fair and complete.
In addition, I didn't cite any sources. When I come back for the second pass, I might add some, but in the meantime any addition of sources is welcome.
Kenneth Gentry has a relevant post on this, which might be used as a source. I'll post here, so you can use it how you think best:
https://postmillennialworldview.com/2016/09/16/does-god-forbid-images-of-christ/
