Difference between revisions of "Opposition to ancient Near East custom"

From Theonomy Wiki
(initial version)
Line 16: Line 16:
[[ Category:Exodus 21:14 ]]
[[ Category:Exodus 21:14 ]]
[[Category:Ancient Near East Legal Systems]]
[[Category:Ancient Near East Legal Systems|Category:Note]]
[[Category:Exodus 21:14|Category:Note]]
[[Category:Pages using DynamicPageList parser function|Category:Note]]

Latest revision as of 20:03, 17 May 2021

Notes Overview

Umberto Cassuto:

It was a widespread custom, both in Eastern and Western countries, and accepted also in Israelite usage (i Kings ii 28 ff.; see on this point above, p. 261), that whoever entered a sacred place was saved from all punishment, even if he had killed a person willfully. The Torah abolishes this practice in the case of deliberate murder; the sanctity of the temple cannot override the sanctity of human life.[1]

That puts this Exodus law in opposition to the "ordeal" (which was a commonly-used attempt to force judicial knowledge from God (or the gods)). The willful violation of a holy place would no longer signal anything about God's judicial assessment.

Just another example of how Biblical law opposed the law systems of the surrounding nations.


  1. Cassuto, A Commentary on the Book of Exodus, 270