On the culpability of Saul's sons

From Theonomy Wiki
Revision as of 11:26, 19 July 2020 by Mgarcia (talk | contribs) (Created page with "__NOTOC__ <span class="notebody"> Given the lack of information about what was perpetrated on the Gibeonites, we can assume that Saul's sons were accessories in the act of mur...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Given the lack of information about what was perpetrated on the Gibeonites, we can assume that Saul's sons were accessories in the act of murder, and that David knew this. Verse 1 states explicitly that Saul's "house," or "household," was guilty. Biblical law explicitly states:

Scriptblock:Deuteronomy 24:16

Greg Bahnsen:

"What we have is a case parallel to that of Achan in Joshua 7. There the nation was afflicted for an individual's sin, and ultimately the family of the individual was executed along with him (for they could hardly have failed to detect Achan's burying money and keeping war spoil in his tent). They were guilty, at least, of complicity with him." [1]

Associated scriptures

Part of topics:

Category On the culpability of Saul's sons not found
  1. "Law and Atonement in the Execution of Saul's Seven Sons", Journal of Christian Reconstruction v.2 n.2, 142-143