How did Jesus "fulfill" the Law? (Matt. 5:17-19)/ru

⮜ Ответы на вопросы

Быстрый ответ: Иисус, под словом "исполнить" подразумевалось, что он "подтвердит" и "завершит" пророческую и типологическую части закона и пророков. Таким образом, (как признает большинство христиан) "некоторые" части закона умерли - но ни в коем случае не "все". Иисус пришел не для того, чтобы отменить закон, и не для того, чтобы сохранить каждую его йоту без изменений до конца времени.

Введение

Большинство христиан знакомо с Нагорной проповедью Иисуса. Но часто они не осознают важности вводных слов Иисуса:

17 “Don’t think that I came to destroy the law or the prophets. I didn’t come to destroy, but to fulfill. 18 For most certainly, I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not even one smallest letter or one tiny pen stroke shall in any way pass away from the law, until all things are accomplished. 19 Therefore, whoever shall break one of these least commandments and teach others to do so, shall be called least in the Kingdom of Heaven; but whoever shall do and teach them shall be called great in the Kingdom of Heaven. Matthew 5:17-19WEB

Иисус в начале Своей проповеди ясно дал понять: ничего из того, что Он собирался сказать, не следует толковать как отмену или отмену закона. Он сказал: "Я пришел не для того, чтобы отменить [закон]...". Это утверждение было необходимо, потому что евреи в первом веке, которые слышали только <эм> лживые</эм> учения фарисеев (основанные на так называемом "Устном законе"), могли подумать, что Иисус каким-то образом делает недействительным написанный закон Божий. Но Он лишь делал недействительными ложные манипуляции фарисеев с законом (например, Матф. 15:3 и далее). Грег Бансен написал целую главу в своей книге "Теономия в христианской этике" на вышеприведенном отрывке из Священного Писания. Глава была озаглавлена: "Строгое соблюдение Закона в подробностях (Матфея 5:17-19)". В обсуждении этого отрывка д-р Бансен имеет большую ценность, и его определенно стоит прочитать. Д-р Бансен кратко изложил различные подходы к слову "исполнить" следующим образом:

В этом отрывке были предложены различные чувства для "выполнения". Означает ли это, что Иисус положил конец,⁴⁵ заменяет,⁴⁶ дополнения (добавки к),⁴⁷ намеревается активно подчиняться,⁴⁸ обеспечивать соблюдение,⁴⁹ или подтверждает и восстанавливает закон?.

Доктор Бансен подробно обсудил каждый из этих вариантов. В конечном счете, он утверждал, что "выполнять" следует понимать как означающее как "подтверждать", так и "устанавливать" (в прямой противоположности слову "отменять" ранее в этом стихе) Одним из следствий мнения д-ра Бахнсена является то, что закон остается обязательным - даже в Новом Пакте - в "исчерпывающих деталях" (таким образом, в названии его главы). Он написал:

Трудно представить, как Иисус мог бы более интенсивно утверждать, что каждый бит закона остается обязательным в евангельский век.

По словам доктора Бансена, каждая часть закона остается обязательной до конца "физической вселенной":

Христос... утверждает, что закон будет оставаться в силе до тех пор, пока существует физическая вселенная, то есть до конца века или мира. ... Если принять во внимание фактическое окончание неба и земли, то мы увидим, что Писание учит его быть при Втором пришествии Христа ..... По крайней мере, до этого момента детали закона останутся. ... Παρέλθῃ дважды используется в этом стихе: первый из физической вселенной, а второй из мельчайших деталей закона Божьего..

Я предложу другое понимание слова "исполнить" Иисуса, чем доктор Бансен. Чтобы это эссе было коротким, я буду лишь минимально взаимодействовать с тем, что он написал. Я покажу, что Иисус под словом "исполнить" подразумевал, что Он будет подтверждать и завершать пророческую и типологическую части закона и пророков. Поэтому некоторые приметы и титры закона скончались - но далеко не все. Иисус пришел не для того, чтобы отменить закон, не для того, чтобы до конца времени сохранить все его типологические части.

Иисус подтвердил и завершил закон и пророков

Иисус говорит, что Он пришел, чтобы исполнить две вещи: закон и пророков. Большинство людей, прочитавших Евангелие от Матфея, понимают, что Иисус имел в виду, когда говорил "исполнить" "Пророков". На самом деле, это повторяющаяся тема "исполнения" в Евангелии от Матфея:

15 and was there until the death of Herod, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the Lord through the prophet, saying, “Out of Egypt I called my son.” Matthew 2:15WEB

Миссия Иисуса как Мессии исполнила Ветхозаветные пророчества, и Матфей постоянно указывает на то, когда это случилось (Матфея 1,22; 2,17.23; 4,14; 8,17; 12,17; 13,35; 21,4; 26,54.56; 27,9). По мере того как Иисус исполнял эти пророчества, Он совершал еще два дела:

1. Он подтвердил, что пророчество истинно. [Смотри, например, Лука 24:25-26.]
2. Он завершил пророчество.

Что касается вышеприведенного числа 2: завершив пророчество, Иисус также позаботился о том, чтобы это никогда больше не нуждалось в исполнении. Так, например, как только мы узнаем, что ветвь от корня Иессея уже пришла (см. Исаии 11,1-10, цитата из Римлянам 15,12), мы не будем продолжать исследовать будущие поколения Иессея на предмет наличия дополнительных ветвей. Пророчество исполнило Божью цель и теперь является полным. А как же закон? Совершил ли Иисус Закон таким же образом, чтобы он больше никогда не нуждался в исполнении?

Да... но только части Закона. Есть два основных способа, которыми Иисус "исполнил" Закон:

1. Иисус подтвердил и дополнил некоторые особые "пророчества" в Законе, сделав их реальностью.
2. Иисус подтвердил и дополнил "типологию", заложенную в некоторых частях закона (например, жертвенном), проявив себя как "тело"/антитип, на который указывает "тень"/тип закона.

Давайте рассмотрим поближе эти два аспекта.

Иисус завершил конкретные пророчества в законе

К счастью для толкователей Матф. 5:17, Иисус сказал Своим ученикам (и нам) <эм> точно</эм>, как Он имел в виду исполнение слова:

44 He said to them, “This is what I told you while I was still with you, that all things which are written in the law of Moses, the prophets, and the psalms concerning me must be fulfilled.” Luke 24:44WEB

"Все, что написано в законе Моисеевом... касается меня", относится к конкретным пророчествам (и пророческой типологии, как я покажу в следующем разделе), которые были заложены в "законе Моисеевом" (фраза ссылается на Иисуса Навина 8:34, и означает Тору Бытия через Второзаконие), которая предсказывала личность и дело грядущего Мессии. D. А. Карсон, комментируя Матф. 5:17-19, пишет:

Лучшее толкование этих трудных стихов говорит о том, что Иисус исполняет Закон и Пророков в том, что они указывают на Него, и Он есть их исполнение... Поэтому мы даем pleroo ("исполнить") в точности то же значение, что и в цитатах из формул, которые в прологе (Матф. 1-2) уже сделали большой акцент на пророческую природу ОТ и на то, как он указывает на Иисуса. Даже события ОТ имеют это пророческое значение (см. 2:15). Чуть позже Иисус настаивает на том, что "все Пророки и Закон пророчествовали" (11:13). Манера пророческого предзнаменования варьируется. Исход, утверждает Матфей (2:15), предвещает призвание из Египта 'сына Божьего'. Карсон, 'Матфей' [пояснения к Библии].

Иисус говорил людям, что Он пришел "исполнить" (как в "исполнить то, что было предсказано") все невыполненные пророчества, которые были и в "Законе и в Пророках". Христиане не часто думают о "Законе" как о текстовом жанре, содержащем пророчества, но в Законе много пророчеств, а не только в "Пророках". Вот три важных пророчества из Закона, которые исполнил Иисус.

1. Иисус был пророком, как Моисей

Апостол Петр, выступая перед народом в Деяниях 3, цитировал из пророчества во Вторнике. 18:18-19:

20 and that he may send Christ Jesus, who was ordained for you before, 21 whom heaven must receive until the times of restoration of all things, which God spoke long ago by the mouth of his holy prophets. 22 For Moses indeed said to the fathers, ‘The Lord God will raise up a prophet for you from among your brothers, like me. You shall listen to him in all things whatever he says to you. 23 It will be that every soul that will not listen to that prophet will be utterly destroyed from among the people.’ Acts 3:20-23WEB

2. Jesus was the promised "seed" of Abraham

Right after Peter spoke the above, he said: 25 Ye are the children of the prophets, and of the covenant which God made with our fathers, saying unto Abraham, And in thy seed shall all the kindreds of the earth be blessed. 26 Unto you first God, having raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turning away every one of you from his iniquities.Acts 3:25-26KJV Depending upon the translation you are using [on our wiki, the passage above can vary, depending upon your choice of translation], the Greek word σπέρματί might be translated "offspring," "family," or "descendant," rather than the more literal "seed." Jesus Christ was that "seed" of the prophecy which the apostle Peter was quoting. The apostle Paul also confirmed that this was the proper interpretation of that promise: 16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.Galatians 3:16KJV Again, this passage is best understood in a translation which renders the Greek σπέρματί in a consistently literal way. Paul is making a point based upon the fact that the word is singularly referring to Jesus Christ.

3. Jesus was the lion of the tribe of Judah

2 I saw a mighty angel proclaiming with a loud voice, “Who is worthy to open the book, and to break its seals?” 3 No one in heaven above, or on the earth, or under the earth, was able to open the book or to look in it. 4 Then I wept much, because no one was found worthy to open the book or to look in it. 5 One of the elders said to me, “Don’t weep. Behold, the Lion who is of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, has overcome: he who opens the book and its seven seals.” Revelation 5:2-5WEB

The above is a reference to the following prophecy in the Law:

9 Judah is a lion’s cub. From the prey, my son, you have gone up. He stooped down, he crouched as a lion, as a lioness. Who will rouse him up? 10 The scepter will not depart from Judah, nor the ruler’s staff from between his feet, until he comes to whom it belongs. The obedience of the peoples will be to him. Genesis 49:9-10WEB

There are many of other prophecies in the Law which Jesus fulfilled (such as the Song of Moses), but the three above are enough to establish the point.

Jesus completed the typology of the law

Certain Sinai Covenant laws (e.g. the sacrificial ones) prefigured the work of Christ. This function of prefiguring is called "typology." In theological study, the word "type" (Greek: τύπος -- often translated "pattern") is a label for something which is an abstracted (simplified) representation of the real thing (which comes later). The real thing which comes later is labeled the "antitype" (Greek: ἀντίτυπος, see 1 Pet. 3:21). You might also have heard these called "shadows," as the apostle Paul does in Col. 2:17. The type corresponds to the antitype, just as a shadow cast by someone's body is an abstracted representation of that body. Thus, Paul says "the body is of Christ" (Col. 2:17). This metaphorical "shadow" of Christ is cast back into many parts of the Hebrew Scriptures, and we see it most often in the sacrificial laws.

For example, the apostle Paul wrote:

7 Purge out the old yeast, that you may be a new lump, even as you are unleavened. For indeed Christ, our Passover, has been sacrificed in our place. 8 Therefore let’s keep the feast, not with old yeast, neither with the yeast of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. 1 Corinthians 5:7-8WEB

Jesus was the antitype to which the type of the Passover lamb pointed. On this understanding, once the reality (Christ and his once-for-all sacrifice) has been accomplished, the original type/pattern/shadow either no longer exists, or -- if it does still exist -- its original function is no longer necessary; thus, we must treat the type/pattern/shadow differently than we did before. We no longer sacrifice a lamb on Passover as the law required (Num. 9:1-3).

When the apostle Paul wrote the following: 4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth.Romans 10:4KJV Paul was not suggesting (contrary to Jesus' own words in Matt. 5:17) that Christ "ended" (as in abolished) the whole law. The Greek word (typically translated as "end" in the passage above) which Paul used is telos, (from which we get our term "teleology"). It can mean either "temporal end" or "goal." No matter which of these translation options we take, it fits with Jesus' purpose of fulfilling the law by completing its typological/didactic purpose:

1. Christ was the temporal end of many of the sacrificial laws which foreshadowed his once-for-all sacrifice. These laws were covenantally-bound, and are no longer binding.
2. Christ was the final goal of the law, which pointed towards his finished work in many ways.

As another example, Jesus' own priesthood abolished the laws which related to the Levitical priests. There are no Levitical priests in the New Covenant. When the Sinai Covenant ended in A.D. 70, the Levitical priest regulations were abolished with it.

The typological goal of the law is what Paul was referring to when he wrote:

23 But before faith came, we were kept in custody under the law, confined for the faith which should afterwards be revealed. 24 So that the law has become our tutor to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. 25 But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor. Galatians 3:23-25WEB

As a tutor, the typological law led God's people toward a goal, preparing them for the coming final work of the Messiah. The tutorial laws which Paul says "we are no longer under" are the covenantally-bound laws (like the typological laws), because Jesus completed them and made them obsolete.

All things are accomplished?

Once we have established what Jesus meant by "fulfill," we can understand what he meant by a particular clause in the next verse (18): "until all things are accomplished." Notice that the exact same phrase is used in the following verse: 32 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled.Luke 21:32KJV

This verse in Luke is a parallel verse to Matt. 24:34.

Without going too much into the eschatology (which others, such as Gary Demar, have already written extensively on), I will merely assert that the words "this generation," in the Gospels, always means the generation of people to whom Jesus was speaking. These are the people who were alive circa A.D. 30. This is a mainstream preterist interpretation, which you can find in many commentaries. Therefore, we can know with certainty that "all things" (whatever that phrase specifically refers to) would be "accomplished" by the end of the first century. Jesus was evidently not saying "until all things that will ever happen are accomplished." He clearly intended the phrase "all things" to have a scope of meaning limited to the first century "generation."

We know that Jesus came to fulfill/complete many Old Testament prophecies and to fulfill/complete certain laws by means of his final, finished sacrifice. Therefore, when he says "until all things are accomplished" (v. 18) in the context of "fulfilling" the Law and the Prophets, we can reasonably limit the reference of this phase to: "until all things prophesied or foreshadowed in both the Law and the Prophets are accomplished."

A chiasm of fulfillment

But if Jesus did cause some of the laws to "pass away," then what are we to make of that other part of his claim: "until heaven and earth pass away, ..."? All of these phrases must be treated together, because they form an interlocking chiasm of meaning:

A until the heaven and the earth pass away, B one jot or one tittle may by no means pass from the law A' until all things are accomplished.

[A chiasm is a common Biblical literary structure which uses forms of repetition and structural reversal for emphasis.]

Clearly, the central clause (B) of this chiasm is dependent upon both the first (A) and third (A') clauses. Dr. Bahnsen himself made this point:

Ηως ἂν πάντα γένηται states unconditionally "until all things have taken place (are past)." Thus this phrase is functionally equivalent to "until heaven and earth pass away." These two ἕως clauses parallel (a common literary device) and explain each other.

I completely agree with Dr. Bahnsen's claim above. We must allow these ἕως clauses each to inform and explain our interpretation of the other. I have already made the case that the second clause ought to be interpreted in the light of how Jesus used these words in Luke 21:32. If "all things" (which Jesus was intending to fulfill) were going to be fulfilled before that generation passed away, then how do we understand "heaven and earth"?

Let's work backwards, using logic. Here is a syllogism:

1. No jots and tittles of the law will pass away before heaven and earth pass away.
2. Some jots and tittles of the law have passed away.
3. Therefore, heaven and earth have passed away.

The above syllogism is logically valid. Premise #1 is scripturally certain (rephrased from Matt. 5:18). What about premise #2?

Jots and tittles have passed away

We all recognize that certain jots and tittles of the law have passed away. No Christian should dispute this fact. For example:

1. We do not circumcise our male babies on the 8th day of life, as the law required: Lev. 12:3.
2. We do not consider ourselves to be unclean when we eat pork: Lev. 11:7-8.
3. We do not search for a Levitical priest (or any kind of priest) to determine whether an ulceration on our skin requires us to be quarantined: Lev. 13:2-3.
4. We do not teach women that they should consider themselves to be ritually "unclean" for 80 days after birthing a girl: Lev. 12:5.

Most Christians neither observe nor teach others to observe these laws, because they were bound to the Sinai Covenant and have now passed away. In Theonomy In Christian Ethics, Dr. Bahnsen himself discusses a law which was "annulled" by the New Covenant:

The Levitical priesthood, representing the Mosaic system of ceremonial redemption, could not bring perfection and so was intended to be superseded (Heb. 7:11 f., 28). ... when Jesus instituted a change in the priesthood (for He was of the tribe of Judah, not Levi) the ceremonial principle was altered as well.... The former commandment with reference to ceremonial matters was set aside, then, in order that God's people might have a better hope.... The commandment which was anulled was "a commandment with respect to the flesh" (i.e. concerning external qualification of physical descent of the priests....).

Of course, Dr. Bahnsen suggests that this "anulling" of priestly qualification was "implied in Psalm 110:1,4," therefore he does not consider it to be a contradiction with his interpretation of Matt. 5:17f. But this "fulfillment" of the law is exactly what Jesus was talking about in Matt. 5:17-19. The changeover to the New Covenant required a change in the covenantally-bound portions of the law, just as the author of Hebrews wrote in Heb. 7:11.

In a book on theonomy published later, Dr. Bahnsen again admitted that "parts of the law have been laid aside or altered":

Jesus is the one who spoke about categorical and exhaustive support for the law - down to the least commandment. It is also the word of Jesus elsewhere which gives us our theological justification for saying parts of the law have been laid aside or altered. There is nothing illegitimate or unique about our Lord teaching by means of sweeping declarations which are given particular qualifications later.

It is therefore evident from "later" scripture that Jesus fulfilled the law by confirming and 'completing certain parts. When these parts were complete, they were "laid aside." We are not bound to do the parts of the law which have been "anulled" and "laid aside" (using Dr. Bahnsen's terms). We are not to teach them as being binding. These laws are the jots and tittles which have passed away.

Heaven and earth passed away?

What about #3 above (the conclusion of our syllogism)? How can "heaven and earth" have passed away? First, we should note that this is not a figure of speech meaning "never." Jesus himself affirmed: 34 Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled. 35 Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.Matthew 24:34-35KJV So we know that "heaven and earth" could (and would) pass away. We also know that our syllogism above is logically valid. We know that the first two premises are true. Therefore the truth of the conclusion is logically necessary. But in what sense have "heaven and earth passed away"? The answer is that Jesus was using symbolic language (as he sometimes did), and he was referring to the destruction of the Second Temple and the abolishment of the Sinai Covenant in A.D. 70 (before that generation passed away). This is where it helps to know something about Second Temple Jewish terminology, and the historian Josephus is our best reference for this. It turns out that Jews of that time actually used the phrase "heaven and earth" to refer to the structure of the tabernacle (and later the temple). Josephus wrote:

this proportion of the measures of the tabernacle proved to be an imitation of the system of the world; for that third part thereof which was within the four pillars, to which the priests where not admitted, is, as it were, a heaven peculiar to God. But the space of the twenty cubits is, as it were, land [ge, also translatable as 'earth'] and sea, on which men live, and so this part is peculiar to the priests only....When Moses distinguished the tabernacle into three parts, and allowed two of them to the priests, as a place accessible and common, he denoted the land and the sea, these being of general access to all; but he set apart the third division for God, because heaven is inaccessible to men.

[Other contemporary references are listed in (Fletcher-Louis, "Jesus, the Temple and the Dissolution of Heaven and Earth", 126)]

Crispin Fletcher-Louis writes:

In the last 20 years there has been widespread recognition that in both the biblical and post-biblical periods the Temple is invested with a set of cosmological meanings: the Temple stands at the centre of the universe; it is the place from which creation began; it is the meeting point of heaven and earth -- the 'Gate of Heaven'; it is the place where, at the end of days, as at the dawn of creation, the forces of chaos would be defeated and, most importantly for our purposes, it is a miniature version of the whole universe -- a microcosm of heaven and earth.

Fletcher-Louis also relates Matt. 5:18 to Matt. 24:35 in the following way:

There are, I suggest, three interlocking referents in the expression 'until heaven and earth pass away' at 5:18d: (1) the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in AD 70 confirming the obsolescence of the Old Covenant; (2) Jesus' death and resurrection confirming the institution of the New Covenant and its messianic Torah; (3) Jesus' life, ministry and teaching as the embodiment of the new creation and the setting-up of the messianic Torah which His new community follows.
...
It seems now that when the close parallel to Matthew 5:18 at 24:35 refers to the passing away of heaven and earth and endurance of Jesus' words, the first of the three referents in the former text is to the forefront. With the temple cult gone, Jewish Christians should not feel its loss since they still had Jesus' teaching.

It is reasonable to conclude that Jesus was speaking using the symbolic terms in use at that time: that when he said "heaven and earth" he was speaking of the temple, and using it as a metonym for the Sinai Covenant (of which the temple was the central feature). This identification between the phrase "heaven and earth" and the Sinai Covenant is not a modern theological novelty. For example, here is what the Puritan theologian John Owen wrote about this phrase, as used by Peter in 2 Peter 3:

On this foundation I affirm, that the heavens and earth here intended in this prophecy of Peter, the coming of the Lord, the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men, mentioned in the destruction of that heaven and earth, do all of them relate, not to the last and final judgment of the world, but to that utter desolation and destruction that was to be made of the Judaical church and state.

Notice the following parallel between Matt. 5:18 and Jesus prophesying the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem in Mark 13 (parallels in Matt. 24 and Luke 21):

Matthew 5:18	Mark 13:30-31
18 For most certainly, I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not even one smallest letter or one tiny pen stroke shall in any way pass away from the law, until all things are accomplished. Matthew 5:18WEB	30 Most certainly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things happen. 31 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will not pass away. Mark 13:30-31WEB

Jesus affirmed that "the heaven and the earth will pass away" in the same context as the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem. Some commentators want to split these verses into the "already" and "not yet", because they are presupposing that Jesus must be talking about the literal, physical "heaven and earth." But if he was just using a standard Jewish symbolic term for the temple ("heaven and earth") as a metonym for the Sinai Covenant, then everything else fits perfectly with Matt. 5:17-19. We can thus conclude that Jesus:

1. fulfilled (confirmed and completed) all of the typologies and prophecies in the Law and the Prophets (Matt. 5:18)
2. made provision for Israel's remnant and the gentiles in the New Covenant (Luke 22:20)
3. returned in judgment of Israel in A.D. 70, causing the Second Temple to be destroyed (Matt. 24:2), and thus
4. abolished the Sinai Covenant (Heb. 8:13), without abolishing the law completely (Matt. 5:17)
5. accomplished all this within the lives of "that generation" (exactly as he prophesied in Luke 21:32, Mark 13:30, Matt. 24:34).

New heavens and earth means "new creation." In other words:

17 Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old things have passed away. Behold, all things have become new. 2 Corinthians 5:17WEB

John Owen also understood the "new heavens and new earth" to be fulfilled right now. He wrote:

Now, when shall this be that God will create these “new heavens and new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness?” Saith Peter, "It shall be after the coming of the Lord, after that judgment and destruction of ungodly men, who obey not the gospel, that I foretell." But now it is evident, from this place of Isaiah, with chapter 66:21–22, that this is a prophecy of gospel times only; and that the planting of these new heavens is nothing but the creation of gospel ordinances, to endure for ever. The same thing is so expressed in Hebrews 12:26–28.

The "New Creation" is already here. Jesus is our current, reigning King (just as prophesied in Dan. 2:44); the laws which weren't bound to the abolished Sinai Covenant continue to be binding upon us, just as God intended; and we have two simultaneous, ongoing commissions:

1. to subdue the earth (Gen. 1:28)
2. to preach the Gospel of the current Kingdom (Matt. 28:18)