Difference between revisions of "Translations:Is the premarital unchastity case of Deut. 22:13 an example of the justice system assuming guilt until a defendant proves her innocence?/6/fr"

Latest revision as of 01:55, 1 December 2020

Information about message (contribute)

This message has no documentation. If you know where or how this message is used, you can help other translators by adding documentation to this message.

Message definition (Is the premarital unchastity case of Deut. 22:13 an example of the justice system assuming guilt until a defendant proves her innocence?)

In Deut 22:20, the "signs of virginity" are merely functioning as a rebuttal to the husband's evidence. He must already have provided at least two eyewitnesses, because two witnesses are ''always'' required:

In Deut 22:20, the "signs of virginity" are merely functioning as a rebuttal to the husband's evidence. He must already have provided at least two eyewitnesses, because two witnesses are ''always'' required:

TranslationDans Dt 22:20, les "signes de virginité" servent simplement à réfuter les preuves du mari. Il doit déjà avoir fourni au moins deux témoins oculaires, car deux témoins sont "toujours" nécessaires:

Dans Dt 22:20, les "signes de virginité" servent simplement à réfuter les preuves du mari. Il doit déjà avoir fourni au moins deux témoins oculaires, car deux témoins sont "toujours" nécessaires: